Why do major dental cases at the upper fee range require the veto-holder at both the diagnostic visit and the case presentation? Because the financial weight at the top of the fee range crosses a threshold where the patient cannot reasonably commit alone, and any decision-making partner needs direct exposure to both the diagnosis and the presentation. For a regular major case, the veto-holder being present at the case presentation alone is usually sufficient. For a major case at the upper end of possible fees, the level of financial commitment and life impact is large enough that the veto-holder needs to [...]

Why do major dental cases at the upper fee range require the veto-holder at both the diagnostic visit and the case presentation? Because the financial weight at the top of the fee range crosses a threshold where the patient cannot reasonably commit alone, and any decision-making partner needs direct exposure to both the diagnosis and the presentation. For a regular major case, the veto-holder being present at the case presentation alone is usually sufficient. For a major case at the upper end of possible fees, the level of financial commitment and life impact is large enough that the veto-holder needs to [...]

Why do major dental cases at the upper fee range require the veto-holder at both the diagnostic visit and the case presentation? Because the financial weight at the top of the fee range crosses a threshold where the patient cannot reasonably commit alone, and any decision-making partner needs direct exposure to both the diagnosis and the presentation. For a regular major case, the veto-holder being present at the case presentation alone is usually sufficient. For a major case at the upper end of possible fees, the level of financial commitment and life impact is large enough that the veto-holder needs to [...]